How to use Apache Flink for High-Volume Stream Processing

The article provides in-depth insights into quantifying workload requirements, optimizing cluster resources, managing distributed state, and efficiently scaling source and sink connectors. It serves as a guide for implementing Apache Flink in production environments where terabytes of data are processed daily, ensuring effective scaling and performance optimization.

GraphQL has a role beyond API Query Language- being the backbone of application Integration
background Coditation

How to use Apache Flink for High-Volume Stream Processing

Streaming data platforms like Apache Flink are increasingly critical for companies to make timely business decisions and power data-driven products. Flink's high-throughput and low-latency distributed architecture makes it well-suited for mission-critical workloads at massive scale. However, even with Flink's inherent scaling capabilities,Production workloads generating terabytes of data daily have additional operational, data distribution and fault tolerance considerations.
Architects must analyze end-to-end pipeline characteristics and leverage multiple orchestration techniques in Flink to scale streaming applications supporting business metrics, real-time dashboards and data science models for billions of events per day.

Quantifying Workload Requirements

The first step is gathering exhaustive workload requirements and constraints - both functional and non-functional. Critical attributes like:

  • Data volume and ingress patterns - bursts, spikes etc.
  • Data accumulation over window for analysis. Example: > 1 TB/day
  • Processing needs - enrichment, cleansing, transformations
  • Analytics latency thresholds < 500 ms
  • Uptime SLAs - 99.99%
  • Output velocity for downstream consumption
  • Cost budgets

Instrument reference pipelines to collect precise metrics on throughput, data shuffle sizes, processing times for different functions. Analyze pipeline DAGs to identify potential scaling bottlenecks. This quantification clarifies resource provisioning needs.
For instance, daily data volume exceeding 1 TB with sub-second latency requirement implies provisioning capacity for peak ingestion of > 40,000 events/sec. Fault tolerance needs translate to checkpointing intervals. Such data-backed models help dimension infrastructure and Flink configurations.

Scaling Cluster Resources

Use workload data to model TaskManager sizing - CPUs, memory, network IO. Allocating TaskManagers with too little memory causes frequent buffer swapping to disk. Task allocation fails if more slots are provisioned than available CPUs. Similarly, oversized TaskManagers also waste resources. Modeling helps optimize slot-to-task ratio and resource utilization. For example, 16 slot, 64 GB TaskManagers allow ~4 parallel tasks per CPU.
Keep JobManager sized in proportion to worker nodes. Underpowered JobManager cannot coordinate large clusters despite available slots. High-availability configurations with standby masters are imperative. Monitor cluster load during failover. If failover degrades performance, resize JobManager. Architect for peak data rates with infrastructure elasticity and auto-scaling capabilities.

Tuning Parallelism & Distribution Factors

Configure Flink parallelism parameters based on identified pipeline bottlenecks:

  • Operator Parallelism: For high compute UDFs with low output volume like ML scoring.
  • Transport Parallelism: For huge shuffle data exchanges like window aggregates.
  • Task Slots: Balance slot-to-core ratio across desired parallelism.
  • Maximum System Parallelism: Set 20-50% above expected peak load.

Tuning these parameters distributes pipeline capacity across cluster resources. Getting the balance right ensures efficient resource utilization at scale.
Additionally, optimize delivery guarantee timeout intervals to reduce recovery overheads. Likewise, shed load periodically if subsets of data streams are disposable during peaks. For example, sampling aggregated metrics at 98% accuracy temporarily instead of perfect accuracy.

Managing Distributed State at Scale

Flink provides multiple state backends with different scale/performance tradeoffs:

  • MemoryStateBackend: Low latency but loses state onfailures and limited capacity.
  • FsStateBackend: Writes state checkpoints to distributed filesystems like S3/HDFS to transparently scale capacity. Limited only by underlying filesystem.
  • RocksDBStateBackend: Incremental key-value state store on TaskManager local storage. High performance read/writes than remote storage options. Local storage limits aggregate state capacity.

Choose backend aligned to access patterns and storage limitations:

  • Keyed State: RocksDB's indexed access well-suited for sharded key-partitioned state.
  • Large Read-Only Broadcast State: FsStateBackend avoids replication overheads.
  • Small Operator State: Memory backend minimizes serialization costs.

RocksDB performs well for incremental state but needs TTL-based expiry to bound unbounded growth over continuous streaming windows. Compact state after windows close to lower read amplification.
Shard states across keys to leverage parallelism. Ensure state schema allows horizontal scaling - avoid non-keyed state derivation in UDFs which breaks sharding. Allocate sufficient state read/write budget when provisioning TaskManagers.

Rebalancing Work Distribution at Runtime

Over time, uneven data distribution or outages can create skew across partitions. Flink provides mechanism to rebalance operators/state across cluster by suspending upstream, redistributing state, rerouting upstream and resuming pipelines. Initiating rebalance via API or config flags dynamically optimizes work distribution.
Another approach is work-stealing, where underutilized TaskManagers can actively pull additional workload from overutilized instances. This achieves better resource utilization without requiring full pipeline restarts.
Integrate repartitioning and autoscaling capabilities with monitoring & orchestration layer for automated optimization under shifting workload patterns.

Scaling Source, Sink & Externals

Flink itself does not ingest or store stream data. The end-to-end architecture must scale underlying source connectors pulling events from streaming buses, files or databases; as well as sink connectors writing output into storage systems. Common pitfalls include:

  • Underprovisioned message queues saturating ability to ingest peak traffic.
  • Few Kafka partitions throttling maximum read parallelism.
  • Unsharded external databases/object stores becoming write bottlenecks.

Architect stream generation & consumption technologies for required concurrency, throughput and availability SLAs. MongoDB, Cassandra etc scale linearly with nodes added. Kafka offers significant scaling leveraging topics/partitions model. Additionally, scale ancillary services like Zookeeper, Schema Registry supporting stream sources/sinks to avoid hidden chokepoints. Monitor their metrics in coordination with Flink cluster.


Scaling stream processing necessitates end-to-end systems thinking encompassing data characteristics, pipeline computation patterns and failover behaviors along with Flink's native scaling constructs. Distribute configurations across infrastructural dimensions like state storage, partitioning, batching, parallelism and dynamic work rebalancing to create an inherently scalable architecture that withstands unpredictable workloads. Prescriptive approaches based on precise workload analytics help achieve massive scale efficiently.

Want to receive update about our upcoming podcast?

Thanks for joining our newsletter.
Oops! Something went wrong.